The newest task force formed at the request of the governor to review education in Idaho looks hauntingly similar to the last, especially among the invited guests. But the governor’s office says there are significant differences between the groups, most obvious the context of the education conversation in today’s landscape.
In August of 2007, the governor asked the business community to work with educational stakeholders to find ways to improve education. The Education Alliance of Idaho was formed and after nearly three years of work, its recommendations where unveiled by the governor in late 2009. Those recommendations included tying teacher compensation to performance, increasing the use of technology and increasing the level of public confidence in the education system through accountability. Sound familiar? They should, because those recommendations helped shape the Students Come First laws. We all know what happened to those.
Fast forward to today. The governor has asked the State Board of Education to do the same thing — work with educational stakeholders to find ways to improve education.
Here is a list of those groups that formed the Education Alliance of Idaho from 2007-09:
- Idaho Education Association
- Idaho Association of School Administrators
- Idaho School Board Association
- Idaho Parent Teacher Association
- Idaho Digital Learning Academy
- State Board of Education
- State Department of Education
- State Division of Professional-Technical
- Idaho Business Coalition for Educational Excellence (now called IBE)
Here is a list of some of the groups that form today’s task force:
- Idaho Education Association
- Idaho Association of School Administrators
- Idaho School Board Association
- Idaho Parent Teacher Association
- Idaho Digital Learning Academy
- State Board of Education
- State Department of Education
- Idaho Business for Education (formerly known as IBCEE)
So what’s the difference?
The governor’s press secretary, Jon Hanian, says there are significant differences. Here is how he describes the differences:
- We asked the big three associations (school boards, teachers, and administrators) to pick educators from their respective members, schools and districts around the state to participate. Further, we are asking they be held accountable for being vocal and collaborating.
- Half of this group consists of working educators, not lobbyists, retired educators, or elected officials.
- The Idaho business community (Idaho Business for Education, IACI) has laser focused on becoming more sophisticated about education and it will join with higher education (U of I provost Doug Baker) and our State Board members (the overall policy setting body in education) to ensure this conversation takes place mindful of the regional, national, and global realities facing our students, parents and teachers. As the process unfolds, the Board will have the ability to draw other people into the conversation in a meaningful, efficient way.
- The context is different. Idaho enacted the most comprehensive education reforms in America. Then more than $4 million was spent on a public referenda effort to remove them. The landscape is simply different for all parties. Policy makers, educators, and the public are approaching this in an unprecedented way. Governor Otter has created a process to incorporate all manner of input, utilize data, and produce viable solutions to improve education. Context may be different, but you know what is the same? Idaho kids require too much remediation at the college level, college participation is still too low, and employers still cite a need for a better product coming into the workforce.
- The Governor and many others remain convinced that Idaho schools can perform at a higher level and that Idaho educators are deserving of more support. But that does not mean the Governor is going to insist that he knows what the solutions look like. He has asked the participants to accept this responsibility as well. This is not a prescriptive process. It is one that will draw on the diversity of thought around Idaho education to produce a viable product. That product may be a demonstration of best practices that can be implemented by districts as they choose, it may be legislative. That will be for this group to help determine as we move forward.
Today’s group of 31 also includes key lawmakers, who are holding their own committee meetings dedicated to improving education. Here is the complete roster of those meeting Friday. (This group is scheduled to meet again Jan. 25 and Feb. 28):
Richard Westerberg, Chair State Board of Education
Doug Baker University of Idaho
Laurie Boeckel Idaho Parent Teacher Association
Roger Brown Governor’s Office
Cheryl Charlton Idaho Digital Learning Academy
Linda Clark IASA, Joint School Dist. No. 2 (Meridian)
Penni Cyr Idaho Education Association (IEA)
Reed DeMordaunt (R) Idaho House of Representatives
Karen Echeverria Idaho School Boards Association (ISBA)
Ken Edmunds State Board of Education
Wayne Freedman ISBA Past President
John Goedde (R) Idaho State Senate
Steve Higgins IASA, Grangeville School Dist.
Mary Huff ISBA, Melba School Board Member
Teresa Jackman IEA, Pocatello
Alex LaBeau Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry
Mike Lanza IEA, ID Parents & Teachers IPATT
Rod Lewis State Board of Education
Bob Lokken Idaho Business for Education
Tom Luna Superintendent of Public Instruction
Alan Millar Idaho Charter School Network
Phyllis Nichols Counselor, New Plymouth School Dist.
Katie Pemberton Coeur d’Alene School Dist.
Roger Quarles Idaho Leads Project
Mary Ann Ranells IASA, Lakeland School Dist.
Anne Ritter ISBA President, Meridian School Board Member
Brian Smith IEA, Sandpoint
Geoffrey Thomas IASA, Madison School Dist.
Janie Ward-Engelking (D) Idaho House of Representatives
Cindy Wilson IEA, Meridian
Rob Winslow Idaho Association of School Administrators (IASA)
